Grade for Steven- 19/20

His original narrative was good and so was his second and third remixes but his first fell short for me. It didn't make sense. I saw that he tried to reverse everything said in the lines but I felt it should have some coherency.

Grade for Caitlyn- 19/20

I loved her original so much I wanted to desperately do a grade of her work. I read her remixes and was impressed overall. I liked what she did with Charlie, it had its own unique take on the original story. Also I'm sure that Hend will appreciate her editing of the original text, this was good. I felt as though she fell short because she did not remix Sarah Mae's narrative.

Grade for Trey- ___

I could not find remixes for Trey... His original narrative was good (although I still question how well he followed the directions of the assignment). The argument was clear and followed a consistent train of thought with an untraditional tangent that did not lead the reader in the pre-existing expected models for a cyclical paper. Well thought out and researched... a tentative 20/20

Steven's grade of my work